When Empathy Backfires for Leaders
Empathy in leadership is often celebrated as a transformative force, boosting team morale, trust, and collaboration. But is there a hidden price to all this compassion? While empathy has undeniable perks, we rarely talk about its potential downsides—how too much empathy can actually hinder productivity, cloud decision-making, and blur boundaries. Are empathetic leaders unknowingly setting themselves and their teams up for burnout and inefficiency? In this article, we delve into the hidden costs of empathy, exploring how it can backfire when not balanced with accountability. We'll uncover the cognitive and emotional strains excessive empathy places on leaders and offer strategies to maintain both a humane and high-performing workplace. By coupling compassion with clarity, leaders can harness empathy's strengths without letting it undermine their effectiveness.
When Empathy Backfires for Leaders
Empathy in leadership is often celebrated as a transformative force in the workplace, boosting team morale, trust, and collaboration. But is there a hidden price to all this compassion? While empathy has undeniable perks, what we rarely talk about are its potential downsides—how too much empathy can actually hinder productivity, cloud decision-making, and blur boundaries. Are empathetic leaders unknowingly setting themselves and their teams up for burnout and inefficiency?
Empathy empowering leaders and organisations
Higher Employee engagement: Leaders who demonstrate empathy can enhance employee engagement, as team members feel valued and understood, leading to increased motivation and productivity (14).
Increased Trust for a better collaboration: empathy helps in building trust within teams, which is essential for effective collaboration and communication (16).
Foster organisational resilience: During challenging times, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, empathetic leaders have been crucial in supporting employees' mental health and well-being, thereby maintaining organizational resilience (14).
Foster Innovation: Empathetic leadership also fosters innovation by creating an environment where employees feel safe to share ideas without fear of judgment (15).
Higher retention rate : Empathy contributes to higher employee retention rates, as individuals are more likely to stay with organizations where they feel understood and appreciated (3).
Overall, integrating empathy into leadership practices leads to a more positive work place culture, improved employee satisfaction, and better organizational outcomes.
While empathy undoubtedly has its benefits, we rarely hear about its downsides. Could too much empathy actually weaken leadership effectiveness?
The Hidden Costs of Empathy
Walking in someone else’s shoes comes with a price that many overlook.
Cognitive Costs: Putting yourself in someone else’s mindset is mentally taxing. Leaders must suppress their own perspectives to understand others, leading to significant cognitive effort (4, 9). When this is constant, it can reduce a leader’s focus and even diminish their productivity.
Psychological Strain: Empathy can bring psychological turmoil, especially when others are in distress. Empathizing with colleagues facing distress or traumatic situations, may challenge a person’s fundamental beliefs about fairness or justice, leading to personal discomfort (7, 10).
Material and Opportunity Costs: Resources and time invested in others’ problems can detract from other critical tasks (5, 12).
Loss of Identity: Constantly prioritizing others’ needs can blur personal boundaries and erode a leader’s sense of self (9). Leaders who take on their team’s emotional burdens often experience burnout, compassion fatigue, or even detachment, reducing their ability to lead effectively (2).
Psychological Strain: Empathy can bring psychological turmoil, especially when others are in distress. Empathizing with colleagues facing distress or traumatic situations, may challenge a person’s fundamental beliefs about fairness or justice, leading to personal discomfort (7, 10).
Empathy is even more complicated for leaders, who face these hidden costs daily. They’re not just occasional advisors; they’re dealing with personal and professional issues in their teams, sometimes unable to “change the channel” or distance themselves.
When Empathy Backfires for Leaders
Empathetic leaders face tough choices: should they ease the burden on struggling team members or maintain fairness and accountability across the board?
Avoidance of Tough Decisions: Leaders who are overly empathetic may avoid necessary but difficult conversations—like delivering feedback to underperformers or making staffing cuts—out of concern for their team’s feelings. This reluctance can hinder a team’s efficiency and accountability, creating a “soft” leadership style that some might view as weak (11).
Compassion Fatigue and Burnout: Regularly empathizing with team members’ hardships can drain a leader’s emotional reserves, leading to compassion fatigue (2). In time, this can cause leaders to emotionally withdraw, reducing their effectiveness and potentially leading to burnout.
Bias and Favoritism: Empathy is often stronger toward those we feel close to, which can create favoritism. This may lead to resentment within the team and erode trust (1, 6). A leader who empathizes too closely with certain employees may end up picking up their slack or redistributing work to others, impacting team morale and fairness.
Accountability Issues: Leaders with lower accountability may tend to “forgive and forget” when empathizing with employees, leading to behaviors like “cyberloafing” (using work time for personal tasks) and undermining productivity (13). Employees might also become less accountable, knowing their empathetic leader will let things slide.
When empathy backfire for some leaders , the cost on leader and on organisations is high. So, how can we avoid these pitfalls while still reaping the benefits of empathy?
Empathy coupled with Accountability
To lead effectively, leaders must balance empathy with accountability, ensuring a compassionate yet goal-oriented environment. Here’s how leaders and organizations can strike this balance:
Focus on Perspective-Taking Over “Feeling-Taking”: Leaders should aim to understand their team members’ perspectives without fully absorbing their emotions. By asking questions and engaging employees in problem-solving, leaders can support them without becoming overly involved (12).
Promote Fairness Over Favoritism: Empathy should extend across the team to prevent any one person from monopolizing the leader’s attention. Leaders should be transparent about decisions, especially when exceptions are made, to maintain trust (11).
Recognize “Takers” and Set Boundaries: Not all team members reciprocate empathy. Leaders must identify individuals who may exploit kindness and set clear boundaries, ensuring accountability remains strong (1).
Ask for Organizational Support: Organizations can support leaders by creating a culture of balanced empathy and accountability. Offering mental health resources, counseling, and flexible support services can relieve leaders from bearing the emotional burden alone (5, 8).
Wrap up
Empathy is vital for building supportive, collaborative workplaces, but unchecked empathy can jeopardize efficiency and accountability. Overly empathetic leadership may lead to costly favoritism, burnout, weak accountability, and even decreased team productivity. To truly harness empathy’s strengths, organizations must foster an environment where empathy and accountability coexist, empowering leaders to lead with both compassion and clarity.
Samar El Hachem
May 2024
1. Adam Grant, In the company of givers and takers, Harvard Business Review 2013
2. Bride, B. E., Radey, M., & Figley, C. R. (2007). Measuring compassion fatigue. Clinical social work journal, 35(3), 155-163.
3. Management Consulted: "Empathy in Leadership"
4. Cameron, C. D., Hutcherson, C. A., Ferguson, A. M., Scheffer, J. A., Hadjiandreou, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2019). Empathy is hard work: People choose to avoid empathy because of its cognitive costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(6), 962–976.
5. Davis, M.H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., Luce, C., 1996. Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representations of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 713–726.
6. Ickes W., Stinson L., Bissonnette, V., Garcia, S., 1990. Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 730–742.
7. Janoff-Bulman, R., 1989. Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: Applications of the schema construct. Social Cognition, 7, 113–136.
8. Levenson R.W., Rueff, A.M., 1992. Empathy: A physiological substrate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 234–346.
9. Sara D. Hodges*, Kristi J.K. Klein , Regulating the costs of empathy: the price of being human University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1227, USA , Journal of Socio-Economics 30 (2001) 437–452
10. Schaller, M., Cialdini, R.B., 1988. The economics of helping: Support for a mood management motive. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 163–181.
11. Steven L. Blader,1, Naomi B. Rothman , Paving the road to preferential treatment with good intentions: Empathy, accountability and fairness Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 50 (2014) 65–81
12. Ramya Srinivasan , , Beatriz San Miguel Gonz ́alez , The role of empathy for artificial intelligence accountability Journal of Responsible Technology 9 (2022) 100021
13. Zhang, Junwei ; Xie, Kun ; Zhang, Yajun ; Wang, Yongqi Emerald ; Unintended influence of leader forgiveness: increased employee cyberloafing; Management decision, 2024-01, Vol.62 (1), p.107-128
14. McKinsey & Company: "It's cool to be kind: The value of empathy at work"
15. World Economic Forum: "The Secret to Great Leadership? Empathy"
16. Grant Thornton: "Empathetic Leadership: Building Trust and Business Benefits"
